Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Ombuna Ongeri & Comapny Advocates v Trident Insurance

Ombuna Ongeri & Comapny Advocates v Trident Insurance (Civil Miscellaneous E719 of 2018) [2025] KEHC 4776 (KLR) (Civ) (20 March 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 4776 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CIVIL CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS E719 OF 2018 TW CHERERE, J MARCH 20, 2025 BETWEEN OMBUNA ONGERI & COMAPNY ADVOCATES .............................. APPLICANT AND TRIDENT INSURANCE .................................................................... RESPONDENT RULING 1. By a notice of motion dated 09th September 2024 brought under Section 51 (2) of the Advocates Act Cap 16 Laws of Kenya (hereinafter referred to as the Act), Rule 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order and Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Rules, the Applicant, a firm of advocates prays for orders: 1. That judgment be entered in favour of the Applicant against the Respondent for the sum of Kenya Shillings ninety-eight thousand, one hundred ninety-four (KES. 98,194) as taxed and certified 2. That the Applicant be awarded interest at the rate of 14% per annum from 18th February 2019 3. Costs of the application 2. The motion is premised on the grounds the Applicant was retained by the Respondent to act for the defendant in Milimani CMCC 276 of 2014 but the Respondent has refused, failed and/or neglected to settle the taxed advocate’s fees. 3. The application is supported by an affidavit sworn by Robert Ongeri on 09th September 2024 in which he reiterates the grounds on the face of the application. Annexed to the affidavit is the letter of instructions by the Respondent dated 03rd April, 2014, the Applicant’s bill of costs dated 20th December 2018 and certificate of taxation for the sum of KES. 98,194, dated 31st March 2023. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/4776/eng@2025-03-20 1

page 1 of 2

4. When the application came for hearing on 13th March 2025, the Respondent, though served on 18th February 2025 neither filed a response to the application nor sent a representative. The application is therefore unopposed. 5. Section 51 of the Act makes general provisions for entry of judgment on a Certificate of Taxation which has not been set aside or altered where there is no dispute as to retainer. 6. In the present case, there is no allegation that the Applicant had no instructions to act for the client in Milimani CMCC 276 of 2014 for which costs were taxed. The Certificate of Taxation dated 31st March 2023 has neither been set aside nor altered and I see no reason to deny the Applicant, judgment as sought. 7. Paragraph 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order states that: “ an Advocate may charge interest at 14% on his disbursements and costs, whether by scale or otherwise, from the expiration of one month from the delivery of his Bill to the Client, provided that such interest is raised before the amount of the bill shall have been paid and tendered in full.” 8. By an affidavit of service sworn by Ayienda Dennis Ongeri on 20th May 2019, there is evidence that the bill of costs was served and received by the Respondent on 18th January 2019. Interest is therefore payable from 18th February 2019. 9. The upshot of this is that the notice of motion dated 09th September 2024 succeeds and is allowed in the following terms: 1. Judgment is hereby entered for the Applicant against the Respondent for the sum of Kenya Shillings ninety-eight thousand, one hundred ninety-four (KES. 98,194) 2. The Applicant be awarded interest at the rate of 14% per annum from 18th February 2019 3. Applicant is also awarded the costs of the application DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 20th DAY OF MARCH 2025 WAMAE.T. W. CHERERE JUDGE Appearances:Court Assistant - Ubah For Applicant - Ms. Kemunto for Ombuna Ongeri & Co. Advocates For Respondent - N/A https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/4776/eng@2025-03-20 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.