Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Thomas Munyau Mang’ondo v Republic

Mang’ondo v Republic (Criminal Revision 63 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 3753 (KLR) (26 March 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 3753 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KIBERA CRIMINAL REVISION 63 OF 2024 DR KAVEDZA, J MARCH 26, 2025 BETWEEN THOMAS MUNYAU MANG’ONDO .................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The applicant filed the present application vide a letter dated 28th August 2024 and received by this court on 25th February 2025. The applicant is seeking a review of the orders issued by this court on 15th July 2024, computing his sentence less by eight (8) months and twenty-one (21) days pursuant to the provision of section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. 2. The applicant was arrested on 13th March 2021 and remained in pre-trial custody until the conclusion of his case on 22nd February 2024. As a result, he was in custody for a total of two (2) years, eleven (11) months, and seven (7) days. However, a computation error occurred in the ruling delivered on 15th July 2024, where it was incorrectly stated that the sentence should be reduced by eight months (8) and twenty-one (21) days. 3. This error is now corrected, and the sentence shall, in fact, be computed with a reduction of two (2) years, eleven (11) months, and seven (7) days, reflecting the correct period the applicant spent in pretrial custody. Orders accordingly. RULING DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 _______________ D. KAVEDZA JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/3753/eng@2025-03-26 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.