Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Richard Makaria & 2 others v Republic

Makaria & 2 others v Republic (Criminal Revision 331 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 3748 (KLR) (26 March 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 3748 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KIBERA CRIMINAL REVISION 331 OF 2024 DR KAVEDZA, J MARCH 26, 2025 BETWEEN RICHARD MAKARIA ...................................................................... 1ST APPLICANT BRIAN ODUOR OTIENO ............................................................... 2ND APPLICANT ROBERT SWATCH ............................................................................ 3RD APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. This file was opened for purposes of considering whether the convicts Richard Makaria, Brian Oduor Otieno and Robert Swatch are suitable for consideration of their sentence review in the spirit of prison decongestion pursuant to the Chief Justice Memo dated 7th December 2022. 2. The applicants were convicted of three counts of assault causing bodily harm, contrary to Section 251 of the Penal Code. For each count, they were sentenced to serve one year in prison, with the sentences ordered to run concurrently. The sentences were to commence from the date of their arrest, which was on 10th May 2022. 3. As a result, the applicants have now completed their sentences, having served the full term of imprisonment. They are no longer under incarceration for the ofienses they were convicted of. RULING DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 ________________ D. KAVEDZA JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/3748/eng@2025-03-26 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.