Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Rodgers W. Washika & 6 others v Retirement Benefits Appeals Tribunal

Washika & 6 others v Retirement Benefits Appeals Tribunal; Retirement Benefits Authority (Interested Party) (Judicial Review Application E066 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 3658 (KLR) (Judicial Review) (24 March 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 3658 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) JUDICIAL REVIEW JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION E066 OF 2025 RE ABURILI, J MARCH 24, 2025 BETWEEN RODGERS W. WASHIKA ................................................................. 1ST APPLICANT KENNETH BOINETT ...................................................................... 2ND APPLICANT GORDON OCHIENG OCHAR ....................................................... 3RD APPLICANT JOHN O. JAKAITI ............................................................................. 4TH APPLICANT AGGREY SIMIYU .............................................................................. 5TH APPLICANT RONALD LUKA ................................................................................ 6TH APPLICANT MURITHI MAINA ............................................................................ 7TH APPLICANT AND RETIREMENT BENEFITS APPEALS TRIBUNAL ........................ RESPONDENT AND RETIREMENT BENEFITS AUTHORITY ........................... INTERESTED PARTY RULING 1. I have considered the application by way of chamber summons dated 18th March 2025 exparte, under certificate of urgency. The court did not find the matter urgent on 19/3/2025 and directed the applicant to pay the correct court fees which has not been paid. 2. On the question of whether leave should be granted to challenge the decision of the Retirement Benefits Appeals Tribunal in Appeal No. 6/2024 rendered on 7/11/2024, I observe that the applicant https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/3658/eng@2025-03-24 1

page 1 of 2

challenges jurisdiction of the Tribunal to hear and determine the Appeal which was filed by the applicants before the Retirement Benefits Authority and escalated to the Tribunal. The application is not prima facie frivolous at this stage as the court will have the opportunity to consider the merits in the main motion. 3. I grant leave to the applicants to challenge the said decision as prayed; in prayers 1, 2, & 3 of the Chamber Summons dated 18/3/2025. 4. The substantive Notice of Motion to be filed and served within 21 days of this order. In addition, I order that the leave so granted do operate as stay of enforcement of the order for costs awarded in Appeal No. 6/2024 by the Retirement Benefits Appeals Tribunal on 7/11/2024. 5. The substantive application to be filed in a separate file. 6. Costs of this application shall be in the substantive motion in any event. 7. This file is hereby closed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI VIRTUALLY THIS 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 R.E. ABURILI JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/3658/eng@2025-03-24 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.