Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Climax Coaches Limited v Lucas Ochieng Onyango Alias Lukas Ochieng

Climax Coaches Limited v Onyango alias Lukas Ochieng (Miscellaneous Civil Application 272 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 3214 (KLR) (31 January 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 3214 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAKURU MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION 272 OF 2024 SM MOHOCHI, J JANUARY 31, 2025 BETWEEN CLIMAX COACHES LIMITED .............................................................. APPLICANT AND LUCAS OCHIENG ONYANGO ALIAS LUKAS OCHIENG .......... RESPONDENT RULING 1. It is always said that he who seeks for equitable reliefs must come with clean hands. 2. The Application before me is dated 26th August, 2024 seeking leave to appeal out of time. 3. The Applicants’ advocate through her sworn affidavit dated 26th August, 2024 deponed that the 60 days’ delay in filing appeal was occasioned by lack of instructions from the insurer Direct Line. 4. The Applicants did not disclose to the Court that the Trial Court had granted stay that lapsed. 5. The Applicants did not disclose to the Court that Part of the decretal amount of Kshs. 210,650/= was paid to the Respondents on 2nd August, 2024. 6. I am not persuaded of the Applicants bonafide in seeking the interlocutory reliefs. 7. I am unable to find merit in the application and the same is dismissed with costs to the Respondents. SIGNED, DATED AND DELIVERED ON THIS 31ST DAY OF JANUARY 2025 ____________________________ MOHOCHI S.M JUDGE In the presence of: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/3214/eng@2025-01-31 1

page 1 of 2

M/s Chemutai for Applicant Respondents - absent https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/3214/eng@2025-01-31 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.