Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Goo v Pn Gichohi, J

GOO v MA (Matrimonial Case E011 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 2964 (KLR) (12 March 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 2964 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAKURU MATRIMONIAL CASE E011 OF 2024 PN GICHOHI, J MARCH 12, 2025 BETWEEN GOO ............................................................................................................ APPLICANT AND MA .......................................................................................................... RESPONDENT RULING 1. This court has heard both counsel. It is unfortunate that the Applicant has died before he could get a hearing before this Court in regard to his application dated 4/6/2024. 2. The application for withdrawal of the same done orally is allowed. 3. As regards costs, it is trite that they are issued at discretion of the Court. It would be unjust to order a bereaved family to pay costs in regard to their bereaved member of their family (Applicant). 4. In the circumstances that matter has not even been heard, there will be no orders as to costs. 5. The file is marked as closed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAKURU THIS 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025. PATRICIA GICHOHI JUDGE In the presence of: Mr Opiyo for the Applicant Ms Shelmith for Kouna for Respondent Ruto, Court Assistant https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/2964/eng@2025-03-12 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.