Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Kombich Alias Kibore A. Kombich (deceased) v Recho Kombich

In re Estate of Kibore arap Kombich alias Kibore A Kombich (Deceased) (Succession Cause 24 of 2015) [2025] KEHC 2682 (KLR) (6 March 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 2682 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMET SUCCESSION CAUSE 24 OF 2015 JK NG'ARNG'AR, J MARCH 6, 2025 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF KIBORE ARAP KOMBICH ALIAS KIBORE A. KOMBICH (DECEASED) IN THE MATTER OF DANIEL KIPNGENO MUTAI ........................................................ 1ST PETITIONER SAMMY KIPKEMOI RONO .......................................................... 2ND PETITIONER AND RECHO KOMBICH ................................................................................. APPLICANT AND ANNAH CHEPKORIR MUTAI .................................................... 1ST BENEFICIARY ALICE NGETICH ........................................................................... 2ND BENEFICIARY RULING 1. I have gone through the pending application and the preliminary objection raised on jurisdiction. I do agree with the objector that this court is functus officio and lacks jurisdiction by virtue of Article 162 (2) of the constitution. 2. The application dated 16/4/2024 is therefore struck out. 3. Notice to issue to the parties. This matter is marked as closed. RULING DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT BOMET THIS 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025. HON. JULIUS K. NG’ARNG’AR JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/2682/eng@2025-03-06 1

page 1 of 2

Ruling delivered in the presences of Kigen for 3rd petitioner, in the absence of parties and Siele/Susan (Court Assistants). https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/2682/eng@2025-03-06 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.