Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Samuel Kamau Ndungu v Republic

Ndungu v Republic (Criminal Appeal E059 of 2022) [2025] KEHC 2648 (KLR) (3 March 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 2648 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAKURU CRIMINAL APPEAL E059 OF 2022 SM MOHOCHI, J MARCH 3, 2025 BETWEEN SAMUEL KAMAU NDUNGU ................................................................ APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING Ex Tempore Ruling 1. The Applicant withdrew his appeal and urged the Court to review the sentence and have the two sentences running concurrently. 2. The Court has considered this application and finds no merit in the same. Reason being the two sentences are unrelated and relates to two separate ofiences against 2 separate victims all committed on separate days. 3. The application for review of sentence is thus dismissed. It is so ordered. SIGNED, DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAKURU ON THIS 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2025. MOHOCHI S. M. JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/2648/eng@2025-03-03 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.