Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 2587 of 2025

In re Estate of Agnes Masbay Ongoma Otieno (Deceased) (Succession Cause 175 of 2014) [2025] KEHC 2587 (KLR) (14 March 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 2587 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT BUSIA SUCCESSION CAUSE 175 OF 2014 WM MUSYOKA, J MARCH 14, 2025 RULING 1. On 1st December 2023, I delivered a ruling herein, where I confirmed the grant and appointed an additional administratrix. 2. The parties have come back to court, with an application for amendment of the grant and certificate of confirmation of grant. The administratrix, that I appointed by my ruling of 1st December 2023, has turned down that appointment, for reasons that she has given. The other argument is that some of the assets cannot be distributed as per the confirmation orders, for a variety of reasons, given in the application. 3. Attached, to that application, is a consent, duly signed by 13 of the beneficiaries. 2 did not sign, being Fredrick Mukasa Okhongo and Charles Omondi Lwanga. Fredrick Mukasa Okhongo has filed grounds of opposition, objecting that the application is not properly founded. 4. Most of the beneficiaries agree, going by the consent that I have mentioned above. The 2 who did not sign are in the minority. Usually the majority have their way, and the minority their say, but the application must be determined judiciously, nevertheless. 1 in the minority has had his say, through his grounds of opposition. The other has not filed any papers, and I have nothing on record to establish that he had been served with the application, for I have not come across an affidavit of service of the application on him. He has a right to be heard before any orders are made to alter the distribution earlier ordered by the court. 5. I shall refrain from making any determinations on the proposed distribution, until I get to hear from Charles Omondi Lwanga, through a filing by him, or evidence, from the administrators, that they served the application on him. Parties have 14 days to comply. I shall mention the matter on 8th April 2025. 6. It is Giannaenerica Kwena Otieno who has declined appointment as co-administratrix. Administration cannot be imposed. Consequently, I shall allow that component of the application. I hereby revoke https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/2587/eng@2025-03-14 1

page 1 of 2

her appointment as such, and the grant on record, if it has been issued, shall be amended to reflect that, and if it has not, then a grant shall be issued without her name. It is so ordered. DELIVERED VIA EMAIL, DATED AND SIGNED IN CHAMBERS AT BUSIA ON THIS 14TH DAY OF MARCH 2025. W MUSYOKA JUDGE Mr. Arthur Etyang, Court Assistant. Advocates Mr. Gabriel Fwaya, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Opiyo, instructed by Aming’a Opiyo Masese & Company, Advocates for the 1st protestor. Mr. Masafu, instructed by Wekesa & Simiyu, Advocates for the 2nd protestor. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/2587/eng@2025-03-14 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.