Ouma v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E054 of 2021) [2025] KEHC 273 (KLR) (24 January 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 273 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT BUSIA MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION E054 OF 2021 WM MUSYOKA, J JANUARY 24, 2025 BETWEEN ALFRED NYONGESA OUMA ............................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT (Arising from a sentence order, in Busia CMCCRC No. 819 of 2011, by Hon. TW Cherere, Chief Magistrate, CM, of 10th September 2013) RULING 1. The applicant herein had been convicted of defiling a girl of 14 years, contrary to section 8(1)(3) of the Sexual Offences Act, No. 3 of 2006, and sentenced to serve 20 years imprisonment, on 10th September 2013, in Busia CMCCRC No. 819 of 2011. 2. He filed an appeal, in Busia HCCRA No. 65 of 2013, principally against the sentence. He withdrew that appeal, on 17th February 2015, after the Respondent filed a notice of enhancement of sentence, under section 354(3)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Code, Cap 75, Laws of Kenya. 3. He has now moved this court, by way of an application for review of the sentence that was imposed on him by the trial court. 4. His application has been opposed by the respondent, vide written submissions, dated 28th November 2024, where it is argued, on the basis of R. vs. Joshua Gichuki Mwangi Supreme Court Petition No. E018 of 2023, that the mandatory sentences or minimum sentences in the Penal Code, the Sexual Offences Act or any other statute are not invalid, contrary to the perception of many, that that had been the effect of Francis Karioko Muruatetu & another vs. Republic [2017] eKLR (Maraga CJ&P, Mwilu DCJ&VP, Ojwang, Wanjala, Njoki & Lenaola, SCJJ). https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/273/eng@2025-01-24 1
page 1 of 2
5. The Supreme Court has resolved the issue of mandatory and minimum sentences, in Republic vs. Mwangi; Initiative for Strategic Litigation in Africa (ISLA) & 3 others (Amicus Curiae) [2024] KESC 34 (KLR) (Koome, CJ, Ibrahim, Wanjala, Ndung’u & Lenaola, SCJJ), where it was held that the decisions in Maingi & 5 others vs. Director of Public Prosecutions & another [2022] KEHC 13118 (KLR) (Odunga, J) and Edwin Wachira & 9 others vs. Republic Mombasa HC Petition No. 97 of 2021 (Mativo, J), that mandatory minimum and maximum sentences, prescribed for sexual offences under the Sexual Offences Act were unconstitutional, was bad law. In view of that, the application herein would be wholly without merit. 6. Upon a sentence being pronounced by a trial court, the High Court intervenes only on appeal or revision. An appeal was filed, with respect to the proceedings of the trial court, the subject of these proceedings, where the sentence would have been considered or reconsidered. The applicant chose to withdraw that appeal. He cannot now purport to revive or resurrect that appeal, by way of the review sought herein. 7. There would be no jurisdiction for me to intervene in the matter in the manner proposed. I, accordingly, dismiss the application, herein, which is undated, but was filed herein on some unknown or undisclosed date in 2021. This file shall be closed. It is so ordered. DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT AT BUSIA THIS 24TH DAY OF JANUARY 2025. W MUSYOKA JUDGE Mr. Arthur Etyang, Court Assistant. Mr. Alfred Nyongesa Ouma, the applicant, in person. Advocates Mr. Onanda Antony, instructed by the Director of Public Prosecutions, for the respondent. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/273/eng@2025-01-24 2
page 2 of 2