Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Isaiah Momanyi Otongo v Republic

Otongo v Republic (Criminal Revision 354 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 183 (KLR) (21 January 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 183 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KIBERA CRIMINAL REVISION 354 OF 2024 DR KAVEDZA, J JANUARY 21, 2025 BETWEEN ISAIAH MOMANYI OTONGO .............................................................. APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The applicant was charged and after a full trial convicted for the offence of stealing contrary to section 268(1) of the Penal Code. He was sentenced to two (2) years imprisonment. 2. He has filed the present undated application received on 27th November 2024 seeking a revision of sentence imposed. The grounds raised are consolidated as follows; that the sentence review is upheld in line with the rule of law, and he urged the court to revise the sentence of the trial court to a noncustodial sentence. 3. I have considered the application, the grounds in support and the applicable law. From the record of the trial court, the court considered the applicant’s mitigation, the time spent in remand custody and the fact that the applicant was a first offender before sentencing. Having considered the application in its totality, it is my finding that the sentence imposed was also legal in the circumstances of the case. 4. In my view I find that there is no irregularity in the sentence imposed by the trial court. The application dismissed for lacking in merit. RULING DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 21ST JANUARY 2025 ____________ D. KAVEDZA JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/183/eng@2025-01-21 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.