Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Jonathan Mnangat v Republic

Mnangat v Republic (Criminal Appeal E002 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 16611 (KLR) (17 December 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 16611 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KAPENGURIA CRIMINAL APPEAL E002 OF 2024 RPV WENDOH, J DECEMBER 17, 2024 BETWEEN JONATHAN MNANGAT ....................................................................... APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The applicant Jonathan Mnangat has filed an application for review of his sentence. He was convicted for the ofience of Grievous harm contrary to section 234 of the penal code and was sentenced to serve thirty years imprisonment. 2. He had filed an appeal through the firm of Changorok Sabulei Advocates but he withdrew it on 16/9/2024. 3. Earlier on he had filed an application for review of his sentence and on 7/2/2024, Judge Mrima declined to revise the sentence. The applicant has come with another application dated 23/2/2024 seeking the same prayer for revision. The court having reduced the same, this curt has no jurisdiction to revisit the issue. The application is dismissed. If aggrieved, he can proceed to the Court of Appeal for redress. File closed DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT KAPENGURIA THIS 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024 R. WENDOH. JUDGE. Ruling delivered in open court in the presence of: Applicant in person (virtual) Mr. Majale for the state https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/16611/eng@2024-12-17 1

page 1 of 2

Juma - Court Assistant. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/16611/eng@2024-12-17 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.