Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

James Bundi v Republic

Bundi v Republic (Criminal Revision E1192 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 16567 (KLR) (Crim) (25 November 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 16567 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CRIMINAL CRIMINAL REVISION E1192 OF 2024 AM MUTETI, J NOVEMBER 25, 2024 BETWEEN JAMES BUNDI .......................................................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The application by the applicant under Section 333 of the CPC has no merit. He seeks to have this court review the orders of a judge who was at the time of sentencing exercising concurrent jurisdiction of this court and reduced sentence to 10 years imprisonment from the original sentence of 20 years. 2. It is the view of this court that the High Court having reviewed. the applicant’s sentence from 20 years to 10 years, this court has no jurisdiction to entertain the present application. 3. This is not the proper forum for questioning the exercise of discretion by a judge of concurrent jurisdiction. 4. The applicant could only escalate the matter to the Court of Appeal if he so desired. 5. The application is therefore struck out for want of jurisdiction. It is so ordered. DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED IN VIRTUAL COURT at NAIROBI this 25TH day of NOVEMBER, 2024. A. M. MUTETI JUDGE In the presence of: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/16567/eng@2024-11-25 1

page 1 of 2

Kiptoo: Court Assistant In person for the Applicant Mohindi for the Respondent https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/16567/eng@2024-11-25 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.