Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Allan Otieno Maina v Republic

Maina v Republic (Criminal Revision E205 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 16524 (KLR) (2 December 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 16524 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU CRIMINAL REVISION E205 OF 2024 RE ABURILI, J DECEMBER 2, 2024 BETWEEN ALLAN OTIENO MAINA ....................................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT (From the original conviction and sentence in Tamu Senior Principal Magistrate Criminal Case No. E164 of 2024) RULING 1. On 3rd June 2024, the convict Allan Otieno Maina was sentenced to serve 2 years’ imprisonment for the offence of assault causing actual bodily harm. He pleaded guilty to the charge. 2. The presentence report recommended 6 months’ community service. The convict was a first offender and the area administrators were ready to held in the reconciliation. 3. The offender has served 6 months of the 2 years’ imprisonment. he is 33 years old and the victim was his wife who only expected the offender to apologise and stop consuming excessive alcohol. The offender has served six (6) months imprisonment. 4. In the spirit of prison decongestion, he is hereby released to serve on probation for the remainder 1 year and 5 months at Tamu and not to breach probationary terms. 5. Signal to issue. 6. File closed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024 R. E. ABURILI https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/16524/eng@2024-12-02 1

page 1 of 2

JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/16524/eng@2024-12-02 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.