Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Michael Makokha Onyango v Republic

Onyango v Republic (Criminal Revision E164 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 16505 (KLR) (2 December 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 16505 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU CRIMINAL REVISION E164 OF 2024 RE ABURILI, J DECEMBER 2, 2024 BETWEEN MICHAEL MAKOKHA ONYANGO ..................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT (From the original conviction and sentence in Nyando Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court Criminal Case No. E396 of 2024) RULING 1. This file is similar to Criminal Revision no E168 of 2024 where both convicts faced the same charge of intentionally withholding electronic payment of Mpesa money from the complainant’s Bank Account erroneously send to them. 2. They pleaded guilty to the charge. They were sentenced to serve one (1) year imprisonment on 29th April 2024 and stated that they were ready to refund the money. 3. They have served 7 months of the 1-year imprisonment. 4. In the spirit of prison decongestion, and for them to look for the stolen money and refund the complainant, they are conditionally released from prison, unless otherwise lawfully held, not to reoffend for the next 6 months. 5. This order to apply to Criminal Revision no E168 of 2024. 6. Signal to issue. File closed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024 R. E. ABURILI https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/16505/eng@2024-12-02 1

page 1 of 2

JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/16505/eng@2024-12-02 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.