Hamisi v Republic (Criminal Revision E081 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 16319 (KLR) (17 December 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 16319 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KIBERA CRIMINAL REVISION E081 OF 2024 DR KAVEDZA, J DECEMBER 17, 2024 BETWEEN MARJAN JUMA HAMISI ....................................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The applicant was charged and after a full trial convicted of ten counts of the offence of robbery with violence contrary to section 296(2) of the Penal Code. He was sentenced to twenty (20) years imprisonment. 2. He has filed the present undated application received on 8th November 2024 seeking a revision of sentence imposed. The grounds raised are consolidated as follows; that the sentence review is upheld in line with the rule of law, and he urged the court to revise the sentence of the trial court to a noncustodial sentence. 3. I have considered the application, the grounds in support and the applicable law. From the record of the trial court, the court considered the applicant’s mitigation, the time spent in remand custody and the fact that the applicant was a first offender before sentencing. Having considered the application in its totality, it is my finding that the sentence imposed was also legal in the circumstances of the case. 4. In my view I find that there is no irregularity in the sentence imposed by the trial court. The application dismissed for lacking in merit. RULING DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2024. D. KAVEDZA JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/16319/eng@2024-12-17 1
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.