Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

George Wanjala Wafula v Republic

Wafula v Republic (Criminal Appeal E052 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 15973 (KLR) (12 November 2024) (Judgment) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 15973 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT BUNGOMA CRIMINAL APPEAL E052 OF 2023 REA OUGO, J NOVEMBER 12, 2024 BETWEEN GEORGE WANJALA WAFULA ............................................................. APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT JUDGMENT 1. The Appellant was convicted of the ofience of assault by the trial court and sentenced to three years imprisonment. 2. His appeal is solely on sentence. He states that the sentence meted against him was excessive. Under section 251 the sentence provided in law is five years. He was denied the option of fine. 3. The Respondent opposed the appeal stating that the sentence provided in law is five years and the sentence of three years was within the law. Reliance was made on the case of Bernard Kimani Gacheruvs- Republic (2002) eKLR. It is further submitted that the appeal hasn’t brought some material facts that might have been overlooked by the lower court and acted on wrong principles. 4. I have considered the grounds, the submissions, and the law plus the facts that were before the trial court. 5. There is no dispute that the case against the appellant was proved beyond reasonable doubt. The conviction was proper. On sentence, the appellant contends that the three (3) years sentence was harsh and that the sentence was without an option of fine. Sentencing is at the discretion of the lower court. Under Section 251 of the Penal Code, one found guilty of the ofience of assault can be sentenced to up to five (5) years imprisonment. The trial court in sentencing the appellant noted that the Appellant was arrogant and violent and that he attacked a teacher within the school compound before school children indeed his acts were unwarranted. However, in my view, the sentence of a custodial sentence https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/15973/eng@2024-11-12 1

page 1 of 2

only in the circumstances was excessive. The Appellant has sought an option for a fine. The ofience of assault is classified as a misdemeanor in law. 6. In considering the appropriate sentence, I will give the appellant the option of a fine. The sentence of three imprisonment is set aside and I substitute it with the sentence of a fine of Kshs. 100,000/- in default three (3) years imprisonment. The period spent in remand shall be taken into account. The Appellant has a right of appeal within 14 days. DATED, SIGNED, AND DELIVERED AT BUNGOMA ON THIS 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024. R. E. OUGO JUDGE In the Presence of: Appellant in person -Present Miss Kibet -For the Respondent Wilkister - C/A https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/15973/eng@2024-11-12 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.