Mbaluto v Republic (Criminal Revision 336 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 15869 (KLR) (16 December 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 15869 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KIBERA CRIMINAL REVISION 336 OF 2024 DR KAVEDZA, J DECEMBER 16, 2024 BETWEEN MULE MBALUTO .................................................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The applicant was charged and after a full trial convicted of the offence of robbery with violence contrary to section 296(2) of the Penal Code. He was sentenced to death. 2. He has filed the present application dated 6th February 2024 seeking a revision of sentence imposed. The grounds raised are consolidated as follows; that he is remorseful for the offence committed, and he urged the court to revise the sentence of the trial court to a non-custodial sentence. 3. I have considered the application, the grounds in support and the applicable law. From the record of the trial court, the court considered the applicant’s mitigation, the time spent in remand custody and the fact that the applicant was a first offender before sentencing. Having considered the application in its totality, it is my finding that the sentence imposed was also legal in the circumstances of the case. 4. In my view I find no good cause or reason to revise the sentence imposed by the trial court. 5. The application dismissed for lacking in merit. Orders accordingly. RULING DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2024 ______________ D. KAVEDZA JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/15869/eng@2024-12-16 1
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.