Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Isaac Juma v Republic

Juma v Republic (Criminal Revision 208 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 15524 (KLR) (4 December 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 15524 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KIBERA CRIMINAL REVISION 208 OF 2024 DR KAVEDZA, J DECEMBER 4, 2024 BETWEEN ISAAC JUMA ............................................................................................ APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. This file was opened for purposes of considering whether the convict Isaac Juma is suitable for consideration of their sentence review in the spirit of prison decongestion pursuant to the Chief Justice Memo dated 7th December 2022. 2. The applicant was convicted on 30th October 2019 for the ofience of Defilement contrary to section 8 (1) as read with sec 8(4) of the Sexual Offences Act No.3 of 2006. He was sentenced to ten (10) years imprisonment. 3. From the record, the applicant has only served five years of his sentence of ten (10) years imprisonment. 4. Having considered the application in its totality, I note that before sentencing, the trial court called for and considered the pre-sentencing report. The sentence imposed was also legal and lenient in the circumstances. 5. In my view I find no good cause or reason to revise the sentence imposed by the trial court. The applicant is directed to serve the remainder of her sentence. Orders accordingly. RULING DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2024 D. KAVEDZA **JUDGE* https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/15524/eng@2024-12-04 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.