Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Erantus Wanyonyi Wanyama v State

Wanyama v State (Criminal Petition E004 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 15419 (KLR) (19 November 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 15419 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KAPENGURIA CRIMINAL PETITION E004 OF 2023 RPV WENDOH, J NOVEMBER 19, 2024 BETWEEN ERANTUS WANYONYI WANYAMA ................................................... APPLICANT AND STATE .................................................................................................... RESPONDENT RULING 1. The Applicant Erantus Wanyonyi Wanyama, filed this application dated 29/8/2023 seeking revision of his sentence under section 233(2) of the CPC. 2. The prosecution counsel Mr. Majale opposed the application and submitted that the Applicant’s appeal was dismissed by this court and he has a pending appeal in the Court of Appeal which he should pursue. 3. The Applicant admitted that he raised the issue of revising his sentence before J. Mrima but the Judge dismissed it. He cannot therefore come back to this court with the same application for review. 4. The Applicant has a pending Appeal before the Court of Appeal which he should pursue. This application is an abuse of the court process and is hereby dismissed. DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT KAPENGURIA THIS 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024. R. WENDOH JUDGE Ruling delivered in open Court and in the presence of: State Counsel: Mr. Majale Court Assistant: Juma/Hellen https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/15419/eng@2024-11-19 1

page 1 of 2

Appellant: Virtual https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/15419/eng@2024-11-19 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.