Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Mbugua Atudo & Macharia Advocates v Kenya Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd

Mbugua Atudo & Macharia Advocates v Kenya Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd (Miscellaneous Application E093 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 15243 (KLR) (28 November 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 15243 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION E093 OF 2023 RE ABURILI, J NOVEMBER 28, 2024 BETWEEN MBUGUA ATUDO & MACHARIA ADVOCATES .............................. APPLICANT AND KENYA ALLIANCE INSURANCE CO. LTD ................................... RESPONDENT RULING 1. The Respondent was served with the application dated 28th May 2024 and hearing notice for today. They are absent and have not filed any response. They have also not filed any reference challenging taxation and neither is there any dispute as to retainer. 2. I enter judgment for Kshs.280,080 as taxed vide certificate of costs dated 5th April 2024 with interest at 14% p.a from 23rd November 2023, one month after taxation as the Applicant never filed evidence to warrant interest to run from 6th November 2018 as prayed. 3. Decree to issue. 4. Notice of entry of judgment and the Decree to be served upon the respondent, giving it 14 days of date of service to settle before execution process can be initiated. 5. Each party to bear their own costs of the application dated 28th May 2024. 6. Mention on 16th January 2025 before the Deputy Registrar to confirm settlement. I so order. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024 R. E. ABURILI JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/15243/eng@2024-11-28 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.