Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v The County Commissioner Kisumu & 2 others

Republic v County Commissioner Kisumu & 2 others; Ombok (Exparte) (Judicial Review E034 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 15228 (KLR) (29 November 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 15228 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU JUDICIAL REVIEW E034 OF 2024 RE ABURILI, J NOVEMBER 29, 2024 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ................................................................................................. APPLICANT AND THE COUNTY COMMISSIONER KISUMU ............................. 1ST RESPONDENT THE DEPUTY COUNTY COMMISSIONER, SEME SUBCOUNTY ........................................................................................ 2ND RESPONDENT THE AREA CHIEF, WEST OTHANY LOCATION .................. 3RD RESPONDENT AND APPOLONIA OMBOK ................................................................................ EX PARTE RULING 1. I have perused the exparte Chamber Summons dated 28th November 2024 filed under certificate of urgency. I find no urgency involved. I decline to certify it as urgent. 2. I have perused the orders sought. The Applicant seeks for leave to apply for Judicial Review as the substantive prayer yet the prayer does not disclose what Judicial Review orders are being sought. 3. I find the application fatally incompetent as the orders sought are barren of any substance. The application dated 28th November 2024 is stuck out for being incompetent. The applicant is at liberty to file a competent application for consideration. This file is closed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024 R. E. ABURILI JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/15228/eng@2024-11-29 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.