Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Cleophas Asindi Odenyo v Republic

Odenyo v Republic (Criminal Petition 133 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 15121 (KLR) (22 November 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 15121 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT SIAYA CRIMINAL PETITION 133 OF 2023 RE ABURILI, J NOVEMBER 22, 2024 BETWEEN CLEOPHAS ASINDI ODENYO .............................................................. APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The Petitioner Cleophas Asindi Odongo was charged in Siaya HCCR E007/2021 with the ofience of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code which was reduced to manslaughter contrary to Section 202 as read with Section 205 of the Penal Code via a Plea Bargaining Agreement dated 24/11/2021 and he was sentenced to serve 15 years imprisonment on 24/11/2021. He has petitioned for revision of sentence vide his Petition dated 4/9/2023 to a less severe communitybased sentence because he has reformed. 2. I have considered the Petition and submissions dated 4/9/2023. Upon conviction for manslaughter, Section 205 of the Penal Code provides for punishment of up to life imprisonment. The 15 years imprisonment which was to be calculated from date of arrest, the court already exercised discretion, having regard to the circumstances of each case. 3. That being the case, the court has no residual discretion to reduce that lawful sentence further. 4. The petition dated 4/4/2024 is hereby dismissed. Signal to issue. 5. File closed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT SIAYA THIS 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024 R. E. ABURILI JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/15121/eng@2024-11-22 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.