Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Wilfrida Otieno Ngesa v Samuel Wafula & 1 other

Ngesa v Wafula & another (Miscellaneous Application E019 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 14953 (KLR) (28 November 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 14953 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT BUSIA MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION E019 OF 2024 WM MUSYOKA, J NOVEMBER 28, 2024 BETWEEN WILFRIDA OTIENO NGESA ................................................................ APPLICANT AND SAMUEL WAFULA ........................................................................ 1ST RESPONDENT MARY ATIENO ............................................................................. 2ND RESPONDENT RULING 1. On 20th September 2024 I delivered a ruling herein where I held that the filing of this miscellaneous cause was in abuse of court process, as the application filed herein, dated 25th April 2024, ought to have been filed in Busia HCSC No. 18 of 2016, as it was in respect of orders that had been made on 29th January 2019, in Busia HCSC No. 18 of 2016. 2. I directed that the file in Busia HCSC No. 18 of 2016 be availed before me, for perusal, so that I could consider consolidation of this cause with the succession cause. 3. The file in Busia HCSC No. 18 of 2016 has been availed, and I have perused it. It has a mention date, scheduled for 12th February 2025. I had delivered a ruling, in that cause, Busia HCSC No. 18 of 2016, on 15th March 2024, where I had struck out a summons, dated 13th July 2023, as it sought distribution of the estate, yet the grant herein had already been confirmed, and the matter was awaiting transmission of the estate, based on confirmation orders made in that cause on 29th January 2019. The mention, scheduled for 12th February 2025, is to confirm whether transmission of the estate has been done in accordance with the orders of 29th January 2019, so that the administration process can be declared complete, and the court file closed. 4. The application filed herein, dated 25th April 2024, seeks stay of the confirmation orders made on 29th January 2019, in Busia HCSC No. 18 of 2016, and leave to file appeal against those orders, out of https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/14953/eng@2024-11-28 1

page 1 of 2

time. No reason has been advanced, as to why that application was not filed in Busia HCSC No. 18 of 2016, where the impugned order was made, and why an appeal, against the confirmation orders of 29th January 2019, was not filed sooner, or leave to file it was not sought sooner. 5. It would appear that the application filed herein, dated 25th April 2024, was a reaction to the orders made in my ruling of 15th March 2024, in Busia HCSC No. 18 of 2016. If the applicant was aggrieved by my ruling of 15th March 2024, in Busia HCSC No. 18 of 2016, she should have appealed against the orders made in that ruling, instead of initiating a separate cause, to address matters that are the subject of pending proceedings. 6. I am not persuaded that this cause should be consolidated with Busia HCSC No. 18 of 2016. It was initiated in abuse of court process. It should be closed. Let the file in Busia HCSC No. 18 of 2016 be returned to the registry, to await the mention on 12th February 2025. The application herein, dated 25th April 2024, is hereby struck out. The instant file shall be closed forthwith. It is so ordered. DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT, AT BUSIA THIS 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024. W MUSYOKA JUDGE Mr. Arthur Etyang, Court Assistant. Ms. Wilfrida Otieno Ngesa, the applicant, in person. Advocates Mr. Odera, instructed by Odhiambo Odera & Company, Advocates for the respondents. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/14953/eng@2024-11-28 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.