In re Estate of Margarita Mwita Machera (Deceased) (Succession Cause 595 of 2014) [2024] KEHC 14904 (KLR) (31 October 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 14904 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MIGORI SUCCESSION CAUSE 595 OF 2014 ACA ONG’INJO, J OCTOBER 31, 2024 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF: MARGARITA MWITA MACHERA (DECEASED) BETWEEN GATI MAROA WANGERA .............................................................. 1ST APPLICANT ESTHER MBONE .............................................................................. 2ND APPLICANT AND LUCAS MWITA MACHERA .......................................................... 1ST PETITIONER NYANSWI MWITA HABABU ....................................................... 2ND PETITIONER RULING 1. Objectors Application dated 22/5/2024 seeks that the Deputy Registrar be ordered to execute and/or sign all the requisite forms and/or instruments of transfer so that beneficiaries identified in respect of the estate of Margarita Mwita Machera as per court order of 12/4/2024. 2. Ruling delivered on 20.12.2023 that the estate of Margarita Mwita Machera comprising 1/5 share of LR BUKURA/ BUHIRINGERA / 101 be shared into 2 portions measuring 2.45 Ha to Gati Maroon Wangera & Nyanswi Mwita Hababu. Application is supported by affidavit of Applicant. The Respondent did not respond to the Application directions were taken that eh application be heard by way of written submissions. 3. This application seeks execution of this courts order dated 26.5.2022, Being that the same reasons unopposed the application is granted with no orders as to costs. DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT MIGORI THIS 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024 A. ONGINJO JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/14904/eng@2024-10-31 1
Original judgment
Gati Maroa Wangera & 1 other v Lucas Mwita Machera & 1 other
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.