Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Grace Kathika v Simon Kinoti Kithinji

Kathika v Kithinji (Civil Appeal E062 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 14877 (KLR) (28 November 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 14877 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MERU CIVIL APPEAL E062 OF 2024 LP KASSAN, J NOVEMBER 28, 2024 BETWEEN GRACE KATHIKA .................................................................................. APPELLANT AND SIMON KINOTI KITHINJI .................................................................. DEFENDANT RULING 1. This is an Application for Appeal out of time and stay of execution of Warrants of Arrest against the Appellant for the main reason that the Appellant has arguable appeal and taken into account all relevant factors and wish to note the following; that the Applicant is aged 74 years . I have read the Application and a. No record of Appeal has been filed and consequently, there is no Memorandum of appeal. b. No the Lower court ruling has been annexed for this court to determine if the Application is arguable or not. At this juncture therefore am unable to determine this application as to whether it is meritious or not. 2. The issue as concerning the health of the Applicant cannot by itself form a basis for granting the orders sought. The lower court judgement was delivered in 2023 and there is no offer for security. Consequently, I dismiss the Application with costs. Orders accordingly. DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024. HON L. KASSAN JUDGE In the presence of; https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/14877/eng@2024-11-28 1

page 1 of 2

Muthomi for the Appellant Muingi for the Respondent Carol – Court Assistant https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/14877/eng@2024-11-28 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.