Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Maureen Akoth Onyango

Republic v Onyango (Criminal Case E019 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 14321 (KLR) (11 November 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 14321 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU CRIMINAL CASE E019 OF 2023 RE ABURILI, J NOVEMBER 11, 2024 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ PROSECUTOR AND MAUREEN AKOTH ONYANGO ............................................................... ACCUSED RULING 1. The accused person herein is Maureen Akoth Onyango. She is charged with the ofience of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. 2. Particulars of the ofience as per information dated 24th July 2023 are that on the 2nd day of July 2023 at Katito Township area in Nyakach Sub-county within Kisumu County, the accused murdered Kennedy Onyango Olonde. 3. The accused took plea of Not Guilty after being examined by a psychiatrist and being found fit to stand trial. 4. The prosecution has called 11 witnesses who testified in a bid to establish a prima facie case against the accused person and now the question is whether a prima facie case has been established against the accused to warrant her to be place on her defence. 5. The defence counsel Mr. Okello submitted that the prosecution had not proved its case against the accused person beyond reasonable doubt. That there are contradictions in the evidence adduced by PW 2 the arresting officer who could not describe the knife allegedly recovered from the accused as a murder weapon and PW 3. 6. That PW 3 stated that the knife was brown in cross-examination. That PW 6 disowned the statement written on 25th July 2023 while PW 4 was giving hearsay evidence as he did not see the event take place or visit the scene of the alleged murder. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/14321/eng@2024-11-11 1

page 1 of 2

7. Counsel urged the court to find the accused to have no case to answer and acquit her. The prosecution counsel did not submit. 8. I have considered the evidence of the 11 prosecution witnesses, the exhibits produced and the oral submissions by the defence counsel on no case to answer. 9. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution to prove its case against the accused person beyond reasonable doubt. However, at this stage, what is required is to establish a prima facie case. 10. What is a prima facie case? A prima facie case in criminal case is defined as…… 11. In the instance case, considering the evidence adduced as a whole, and without delving deep into the merits thereof, I am satisfied that a prima facie case has been established against the accused person to warrant her to be placed on her defence. 12. Accordingly, Maureen Akoth Onyango is found with a case to answer and is placed on her defence. 13. The provisions of Article 50 (2) (i) (k) (l) of the Constitution as read with Section 306 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code are read out and explained to the accused in the presence of her advocate Mr. Okello. 14. I so order. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024 R. E. ABURILI JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/14321/eng@2024-11-11 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.