Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Ridhwan Trading Company Limited & 1 other v Zarah Omar Mbarak & 3 others

Ridhwan Trading Company Limited & another v Mbarak & 3 others (Civil Suit 26 of 2017) [2024] KEHC 14206 (KLR) (13 November 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 14206 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU CIVIL SUIT 26 OF 2017 RE ABURILI, J NOVEMBER 13, 2024 BETWEEN RIDHWAN TRADING COMPANY LIMITED ................................ 1ST PLAINTIFF SULEIMAN NOOR OSMAN ............................................................. 2ND PLAINTIFF AND ZARAH OMAR MBARAK .............................................................. 1ST DEFENDANT FAMILY BANK KENYA LIMITED ............................................... 2ND DEFENDANT OKOTH MARK OKELLO .............................................................. 3RD DEFENDANT RICHARD ODHIAMBO OTIENO ................................................ 4TH DEFENDANT RULING 1. I have considered the application dated 12th November 2024 filed under certificate of urgency. I find no urgency involved. I do not certify it as urgent. 2. I have perused the grounds and affidavit in support. The application seeks orders for setting aside the order of dismissal for non-service upon the Defendants made on 4th November 2024 in the presence of Mr. Odhiambo counsel for the applicant who did not have evidence of service of the application upon the Defendants. 3. I have now been shown an affidavit of service sworn by Moses Musembi Nzomo process server on 12th November 2024 deposing that the applicants made effort to serve the Defendants whose advocates withdrew from acting for them, in vain. 4. The applicants admit that it was their fault not to file into court evidence of efforts made to serve the application hence, the dismissal of the suit for non-service. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/14206/eng@2024-11-13 1

page 1 of 2

5. The affidavit of service is sworn on 12th November 2024. I shall give the Applicants the benefit of doubt. I exercise discretion, review and set aside the order of 4th November 2024 dismissing the application of non-service and reinstate the application dated 2nd August 2024. 6. Having reinstated the application dated 2nd August, 2024, I proceed and set aside the order of 15th May 2024 dismissing this suit for non-attendance to prosecute and substitute thereof with an order reinstating the suit. 7. I further direct the Applicants to serve the defendants by way of substituted service by an advertisement in daily newspapers of nationwide circulation as well as through the defendant’s last known postal addresses and or WhatsApp numbers for the hearing of the suit in the new term on 24th February 2025. 8. I so order. 9. Ruling to be typed and uploaded. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024 R. E. ABURILI JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/14206/eng@2024-11-13 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.