Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Tripple N W & Co Advocate v Esther Mungai

Tripple N W & Co Advocate v Mungai (Miscellaneous Application E201 of 2022) [2024] KEHC 13811 (KLR) (Family) (7 November 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 13811 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) FAMILY MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION E201 OF 2022 HK CHEMITEI, J NOVEMBER 7, 2024 BETWEEN TRIPPLE N W & CO ADVOCATE ....................................................... APPLICANT AND ESTHER MUNGAI .............................................................................. RESPONDENT RULING 1. In their application dated 28th July 2023 the Applicants pray for orders that the taxation dated 7th December 2022 taxing the advocates - client bill of costs at Kshs. 158,700/= be adopted as the order of the court. 2. The Applicants also prayed that interest be awarded. 3. The application is based on the sworn affidavit of Kiroko Ndegwa advocate sworn on the same date. 4. The application was not opposed by the respondent though served. 5. The court has perused the said application together with the annexures thereto and specifically the Certificate of Taxation dated 27th April 2023. 6. In the absence of any opposition to the application and or setting aside or stay of the above certificate of costs the application is found to be meritorious and it is hereby allowed as prayed. 7. Costs to the Applicants. DATED SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIA VIDEO LINK AT NAIROBI THIS 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024. H K CHEMITEI. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/13811/eng@2024-11-07 1

page 1 of 2

JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/13811/eng@2024-11-07 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.