Republic v Nderi (Criminal Miscellaneous Application E022 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 13680 (KLR) (18 July 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 13680 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT CHUKA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION E022 OF 2023 LW GITARI, J JULY 18, 2024 IN THE MATTER OF AN INTENDED APPEAL BETWEEN REPUBLIC ................................................................................................. APPLICANT AND MICHAEL MUTHEE NDERI ............................................................. RESPONDENT RULING 1. The applicant had filed a Criminal Revision seeking a review of the sentence passed on him in Chuka High Court Criminal Case No.6/2019. The record shows that on 29/6/2021 that application was dismissed as he had filed an appeal in the Court of Appeal which was still pending. The Appeal in the Court of Appeal was marked as withdrawn on 27/9/2023 as per the order of that court which is annexed to the Appellant’s submissions. The applicant has filed submissions in High Court Misc. Application which as I have observed above was dismissed by this court. The submissions were filed in Misc. Criminal Application No.E022/2023. In his submissions the applicant states that he was convicted in the High Court Chuka Criminal Case No.6/2019. The proceedings in that court file have not been availed to this court and the court is not able to ascertain what transpired in that file. 2. I therefore make an order that the Deputy Registrar do avail the High Court Chuka Criminal case No.6/2019. The proceedings therein be served on the Respondent to enable them to file their submissions to the petition. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT CHUKA THIS 18TH DAY OF JULY 2024. L.W. GITARI JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/13680/eng@2024-07-18 1
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.