Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Jofetha Khayega Luseno

Republic v Luseno (Criminal Case 22 of 2021) [2024] KEHC 13541 (KLR) (30 October 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 13541 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT VIHIGA CRIMINAL CASE 22 OF 2021 JN KAMAU, J OCTOBER 30, 2024 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ........................................................................................... PROSECUTION AND JOFETHA KHAYEGA LUSENO ................................................................. ACCUSED RULING 1. This matter was partly heard by Musyoka J. This court became seized of the same on 16th January 2024. The parties asked it to proceed from where the same had reached. 2. On 24th July 2024, the Prosecution closed its case after calling a total of six (6) Prosecution witnesses. 3. Both parties did not to file Written Submissions on the question of whether or not the Accused person had a case to answer. They both relied on the evidence that had been adduced by the Prosecution witnesses. 4. Having carefully considered the evidence by the Prosecution witnesses, the court was of the opinion that a prima facie case had been established against the Accused person herein to warrant him being put on his defence. He is hereby put on his defence. 5. It is so ordered. DATED AND DELIVERED AT VIHIGA THIS 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2024 J. KAMAU JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/13541/eng@2024-10-30 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.