Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Levis Mabare Adiya v Republic

Adiya v Republic (Criminal Revision 39 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 13357 (KLR) (29 October 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 13357 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KIBERA CRIMINAL REVISION 39 OF 2024 DR KAVEDZA, J OCTOBER 29, 2024 BETWEEN LEVIS MABARE ADIYA ......................................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The applicant was charged and after a full trial convicted for the ofience of Defilement contrary to section 8(1) as read with 8(2) of the Sexual Offences Act No 3 of 2006. He was sentenced to serve life imprisonment. He filed an appeal to this court and his sentence was reduced to 30 years imprisonment. 2. He has filed the present application received on 5th February 2024 seeking revision of sentence. He urged the court to revise the sentence of the trial court and consider time spent in remand in line with section 333(2) of the CPC. 3. I have considered the application, the grounds in support and the applicable law. From the record of the trial court, the court considered the applicant’s mitigation and the time spent in remand custody. Having considered the application in its totality. The sentence imposed was also legal in the circumstances of the case. 4. In my view I find no good cause or reason to revise the sentence imposed. 5. The application dismissed for lacking in merit. Orders accordingly. RULING DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2024 D. KAVEDZA JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/13357/eng@2024-10-29 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.