Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v The Registrar of Companies

Republic v Registrar of Companies; Waweru (Exparte Applicant) (Judicial Review 26 of 2017) [2024] KEHC 13265 (KLR) (28 October 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 13265 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KIAMBU JUDICIAL REVIEW 26 OF 2017 DO CHEPKWONY, J OCTOBER 28, 2024 IN THE MATTER OF: AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS IN TH ENATURE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW AND IN THR MATTER OF: SECTIONS 8 AND 9 OF THE LAW REFORM ACT (CAP 26) LAWS OF KENYA AND IN THE MATTER OF: AN APPLICATION FO RLEAVE TO APPLY FOR ORDERS OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS AND PROHIBITION AND IN THE MATTER OF: CAP 486 LAWS OF KENYA AND IN THE MATTER OF: REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES AND IN THE MATTER OF: CHIEF MAGISTRATE’S COURT, CRIMINAL CASE NO.2033 OF 2011 AT THIKA AND IN THE MATTER OF: REGISTRATION OF DIRECTORS OF GITHUNGURI CONSTITUENCY RANCHING COMPANY AND IN THE MATTER OF: ARTICLES 22(1), (2)(A)(B) (C), 23(1), 27(1)(2) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA, 2010 BETWEEN https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/13265/eng@2024-10-28 1

page 1 of 2

REPUBLIC ................................................................................................. APPLICANT AND THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES ................................................ RESPONDENT AND JOHN RIMUI WAWERU ..................................................... EXPARTE APPLICANT RULING 1. This matter is for mention for parties to show cause why the suit should not be dismissed for want of prosecution, a Notice to Show Cause having been issued upon the parties on 23rd October, 2023, 8th February, 2024 and 24th September, 2024 respectively. There is no appearance by either party nor their respective counsel. There is even no representation to explain the absence. 2. I have perused the court record and established that the last time there was any activity on the matter was on 27th November, 2018, when the court directed that the Motion be amended to bring in the necessary parties to the suit such as the Company and Attorney General as Interested Parties. 3. It has been almost six (6) years since these direction issued and nothing has been done. This is a clear indication that the parties lost interest in having the matter prosecuted. To unclog the court’s system of this backlog, it is in the interest of justice that the suit be and is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to Order 17 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules. It is so ordered. RULING DATED AND SIGNED AT KIAMBU THIS 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER , 2024. D. O. CHEPKWONY JUDGE In the presence of: No appearance for and by either party Court Assistant – Martin https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/13265/eng@2024-10-28 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.