Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Kinyua & Maingi & Company Advoctes v Trident Insurance Company Limited

Kinyua & Maingi & Company Advoctes v Trident Insurance Company Limited (Miscellaneous Application E213 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 12468 (KLR) (16 October 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 12468 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KIAMBU MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION E213 OF 2023 DO CHEPKWONY, J OCTOBER 16, 2024 BETWEEN KINYUA & MAINGI & COMPANY ADVOCTES ............................... APPLICANT AND TRIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ............................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. This is a ruling in respect of a Notice of Motion application dated 29th August, 2024 in which the Applicant is seeking for orders that:a. Judgment be entered in favour of the Applicant against the Respondent for the sum of Kenya shillings Two Hundred and Nineteen Thousand, Five Hundred and Twenty Shillings (Kshs.219,520.00) only being the certified costs due to the Applicant as against the Respondent. b. That the Respondent to pay to the Applicant the costs of this application together with interest on the taxed sum. 2. The application is premised on the grounds set out on its face and Supporting Affidavit sworn by Njoki Kinyua on even date, the gist of it being that despite the Advocate-Client costs having been taxed at Two Hundred and Nineteen Thousand, Five Hundred and Twenty Shillings (Kshs.219,520.00) in favour of the Applicant as against the Respondent and a Certificate of Taxation issued to that effect, the Respondent has neglected , refused and or failed to settle the same. The Applicant avers that there has been no dispute that the Respondent retained him as their advocate in the matter. 3. The Respondent has not filed a response despite having been served with the said pleadings and hearing Notice as evidenced by the Affidavit of Service sworn by Simon Mutinda James on 13th September, 2024. Therefore, the application be and is hereby deemed as unopposed. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/12468/eng@2024-10-16 1

page 1 of 2

4. As a result thereof, the court proceeds to allow the Notice of Motion application dated 29th August, 2024 in the following terms:a. Judgment be and is hereby entered in favour of the Applicant against the Respondent for the sum of Kenya shillings Two Hundred and Nineteen Thousand, Five Hundred and Twenty Shillings (Kshs.219,520.00) only being the certified costs due to the Applicant as against the Respondent. b. That the Respondent to pay to the Applicant the costs of this application together with interest on the taxed sum. It is so ordered. RULING DATED AND SIGNED AT KIAMBU THIS (UPLOADED VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL) 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER , 2024. D. O. CHEPKWONY JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/12468/eng@2024-10-16 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.