Mohamed & 3 others v Inspector General of Police & 3 others (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E162 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 12213 (KLR) (14 October 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 12213 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KIBERA MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION E162 OF 2024 DR KAVEDZA, J OCTOBER 14, 2024 BETWEEN MOHAMED KUROYOW MOHAMED ........................................... 1ST APPLICANT MOHAMED SALAT IBRAHIM ....................................................... 2ND APPLICANT OMAR KHALIF ADAN .................................................................... 3RD APPLICANT ADOW AHMED MOHAMED ......................................................... 4TH APPLICANT AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ......................................... 1ST RESPONDENT JULIUS MWANANJE .................................................................... 2ND RESPONDENT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS .............................. 3RD RESPONDENT THE HON ATTORNEY GENERAL ........................................... 4TH RESPONDENT RULING 1. The applicants are facing charges before the Milimani Chief Magistrate’s Court. They have now filed the present application seeking anticipatory bail vide a notice of motion dated 11th October 2024. 2. I have considered the application, the affidavit in support and the applicable law. I note that the matter emanates from Milimani Chief Magistrate’s Court and is not within this court’s territorial jurisdiction. As such, the application dated 11th October 2024 is struck out for lack of jurisdiction. File closed. RULING DATED AND DELIVERED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2024 D. KAVEDZA JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/12213/eng@2024-10-14 1
Original judgment
Mohamed Kuroyow Mohamed & 3 others v Inspector General of Police & 3 others
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.