Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Nelson Msengo Kirigha v Republic

Kirigha v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application 109 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 12123 (KLR) (8 October 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 12123 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KIBERA MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION 109 OF 2024 DR KAVEDZA, J OCTOBER 8, 2024 BETWEEN NELSON MSENGO KIRIGHA ............................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The appellant was charged with the ofience of incest contrary to section 20(1) of the Sexual Offences Act No 3 of 2006. After a full trial, he was found guilty of the ofience of incest and convicted accordingly. Consequently, he was sentenced to serve thirty (30) years imprisonment. This court dismissed his appeal against conviction and sentence in its decision delivered on 3rd June 2024 in Kibera High Court Criminal Appeal No 40 of 2023. 2. He has filed this application seeking to be allowed to appeal out of time to the Court of Appeal. 3. I have considered the application, the supporting affidavit and the applicable law. From the record, the applicant filed an appeal against his conviction and sentence which was heard and determined by this court. In the circumstances, the right forum for the applicant is the Court of Appeal. As such, the application is dismissed. The applicant is directed not to file any other application without leave of court. Order accordingly. RULING DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 8THOCTOBER 2024 ______________ D. KAVEDZA JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/12123/eng@2024-10-08 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.