Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Samwel Poghisio v State

Poghisio v State (Criminal Revision E036 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 12050 (KLR) (30 September 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 12050 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KAPENGURIA CRIMINAL REVISION E036 OF 2024 RPV WENDOH, J SEPTEMBER 30, 2024 BETWEEN SAMWEL POGHISIO .............................................................................. APPLICANT AND STATE .................................................................................................... RESPONDENT (From Original conviction and sentence in criminal case no. E395 of 2023 of the SPM’S Court) RULING 1. Samwel Poghisio was charged with the ofience of Grievous harm contrary to section 234 of the PC. He was alleged to have done grievous harm to Owen Rotich. He pleaded guilty to the charge and was sentenced to ten (10) years imprisonment. 2. I have noted that a Probation Oficers report was filed which was favourable to release of the accused on probation. The complainant is said to have sufiered a maim. In my view, Probation would have been too lenient. However, having pleaded guilty, and the Probation Oficers Report being favourable, I think that ten (10) years was on the higher side. For that reason, I hereby revise the sentence. I set aside ten (10) years imprisonment and substitute it with six (6) years. Imprisonment to commence on 17/4/2023. It is so ordered. DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT KAPENGURIA THIS 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024. R. WENDOH JUDGE Delivered in the presence of: In person - Appellant. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/12050/eng@2024-09-30 1

page 1 of 2

Majale for the State. Court Assistants – Juma/Hellen https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/12050/eng@2024-09-30 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.