Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Sala and Mudany Advocates v County Government of Kisumu

Sala and Mudany Advocates v County Government of Kisumu (Miscellaneous Case E195 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 11960 (KLR) (4 October 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 11960 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU MISCELLANEOUS CASE E195 OF 2024 MS SHARIFF, J OCTOBER 4, 2024 BETWEEN SALA AND MUDANY ADVOCATES ...................................................... PLAINTIFF AND COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF KISUMU ........................................... DEFENDANT RULING 1. Whereas the Applicant herein filed an advocate/client bill of costs dated 16.4.2024, the Deputy Registrar noted that the subject matter was a case before the Environment & Land Court wherefore she directed that this file be placed before a Judge. 2. The bill of costs was filed by the law firm of Messrs. Sala & Mudany Advocates. Given that the Applicant is a law firm, it is well versed with the law and is alive to the fact that this court has no jurisdiction to tax its bill of costs. (See article 162/2 (b) and Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act. 3. The bill of costs dated 16.4.2024 is thereby struck out for want of jurisdiction with costs to the Respondent assessed at Kshs.15,000. 4. This file is marked as closed. DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT KISUMU THIS 4TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024. M. S. SHARIFF JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/11960/eng@2024-10-04 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.