Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 11882 of 2024

In re Estate of Atinda Mbata (Deceased) (Miscellaneous Succession Cause 235 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 11882 (KLR) (30 September 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 11882 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU MISCELLANEOUS SUCCESSION CAUSE 235 OF 2024 RE ABURILI, J SEPTEMBER 30, 2024 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF ATINDA MBATA (DECEASED) AND IN THE MATTER OF MONICA ATIENO OMOLLO ........................................................ 1ST PETITIONER JOHN OKOTH OWUOR ................................................................ 2ND PETITIONER (Arising from Kisumu Chief Magistrate’s Court Succession No. E711 of 2023) RULING 1. The deceased Atinda Mbata hailed from Upper Tamu Sub-location, Muhoroni. 2. This is evidenced by the Assistant Chief’s letter dated 16th November 2023 introducing the beneficiaries of the estate and he assets. 3. The Succession Cause was filed at Kisumu Law Courts instead of Tamu Law Courts. 4. The file from Kisumu Law Courts is here for rerouting to the court with geographic as well as pecuniary jurisdiction. 5. I hereby transfer Kisumu CMC Succession Cause No. E711 of 2023 to Tamu SPM’s Court for hearing and determination. 6. The e-file to be transmitted forthwith and upon receipt of the e-file, the court to notify the Petitioners Monica Atieno Omolo and John Okoth Owuor to move that court. 7. This file is closed. 8. I so order. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/11882/eng@2024-09-30 1

page 1 of 2

R. E. ABURILI JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/11882/eng@2024-09-30 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.