Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Duncan Odongo Owino v Republic

Owino v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E162 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 11608 (KLR) (26 September 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 11608 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION E162 OF 2024 RE ABURILI, J SEPTEMBER 26, 2024 BETWEEN DUNCAN ODONGO OWINO ............................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT (From the original conviction and sentence in Winam Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court Criminal Sexual Offences Case No. E03 of 2018) RULING 1. The Applicant Duncan Odongo Owino was convicted vide Winam SPM Sexual Ofiences Case no 3 of 2018 with the ofience of defilement contrary to Section 8(1) as read with Section 8(4) of the Sexual Offences Act and sentenced to twenty (20) years imprisonment. 2. He appealed vide HCCRA no 21 of 2019 and later petitioned vide Petition no E038 of 2023 for resentencing. The appeal and Petition were dismissed. Again, he has applied for resentencing vide his application dated 19th July 2024 claiming that minimum Mandatory sentence imposed was unconstitutional and that he has reformed. 3. I have considered the application dated 19th July 2024 and annexed affidavit and documents. I find no merit in the application as the sentence imposed was lawful. 4. The application dated 19th July 2024 is dismissed and this file is closed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 R. E. ABURILI JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/11608/eng@2024-09-26 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.