Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Daniel Muli v Republic

Muli v Republic (Criminal Revision 24 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 11571 (KLR) (2 October 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 11571 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KIBERA CRIMINAL REVISION 24 OF 2024 DR KAVEDZA, J OCTOBER 2, 2024 BETWEEN DANIEL MULI .......................................................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The applicant was charged and convicted for the ofience of robbery with violence contrary to section 296(2) of the Penal Code. He was sentenced to death which sentence was later substituted to thirty (30) years. 2. He has filed an application for sentence revision and an affidavit in support of the application. He averred that he has undergone rehabilitation since his incarceration. He prayed for early release to aid his reintegration into society. 3. This court called for probation report which was favourable. The report indicates that the applicant is remorseful for the ofience committed. As for her conduct in prison, the applicant has attended a number of trainings and counselling sessions, which have been instrumental in his rehabilitation process. 4. In view of the foregoing, I find the time served as adequate sentence under the circumstances. The applicant is released forthwith, and is directed to report to Kibera Probation Office for purposes of reintegration back into society. Orders accordingly. RULING DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 2ND DAY OF OCTOBER 2024 D. KAVEDZA JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/11571/eng@2024-10-02 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.