Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Two Four Seven Energy For Supply of Petroleum Product v Linus Okuku Ilode

Two Four Seven Energy for Supply of Petroleum Product v Ilode (Civil Appeal E008 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 10834 (KLR) (20 September 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 10834 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT BUSIA CIVIL APPEAL E008 OF 2024 WM MUSYOKA, J SEPTEMBER 20, 2024 BETWEEN TWO FOUR SEVEN ENERGY FOR SUPPLY OF PETROLEUM PRODUCT ................................................................................................ APPELLANT AND LINUS OKUKU ILODE ...................................................................... RESPONDENT (an appeal arising from the decision of Hon. Kassim Akida, Resident Magistrate, RM, in Busia SCCC No. E029 of 2023, of 9th February 2024) RULING 1. The application, dated February 26, 2024, seeks stay of execution of the decree passed by the trial court, and an order deeming that the draft memorandum of appeal was duly filed upon payment of the requisite fees. The appellant argues that its request, at the delivery of the judgment, for stay of execution, was denied, yet it had an arguable appeal. 2. In response, to the instant Motion, vide an affidavit, sworn on 16th April 2024, the respondent argues that the appellant had not deposited the decretal amount in court, and that stay ought to have been sought first ta the trial court. . 3. The appellant is dissatisfied with the determination by the trial court, and it has chosen to challenge that verdict on appeal, to get a second opinion, of a higher court. It is within its constitutional rights to do so. 4. The only thing outstanding would be orders to persevere the subject-matter, while protecting the rights of the successful party at the trial court. 5. The best way forward would be to deem that the memorandum of appeal herein is properly on record, so long as it has been paid for. There shall be stay of execution of the decree of the trial court, subject to https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/10834/eng@2024-09-20 1

page 1 of 2

the condition that the appellant deposits ½ of the said amount, that is to say ½ of Kshs. 910,000.00, in a joint interest earning account, in the names of the Advocates for the parties hereto, within 21 days. 6. To move this matter forward, it shall be mentioned on 17th October 2024, for compliance and further directions, by which time the appellant should have filed and served a record of appeal. Orders accordingly . DELIVERED VIA EMAIL, DATED AND SIGNED, IN CHAMBERS, AT BUSIA, THIS 20TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024. W MUSYOKA JUDGE Mr. Arthur Etyang, Court Assistant. Advocates Mr. Ojijo, instructed by Ojijo Senati & Company, Advocates for the appellant. Mr. Ouma, instructed by Ouma & Company, Advocates for the respondent. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/10834/eng@2024-09-20 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.