Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Ouma Maurice Otieno T/A Om Otieno & Co Advocates v African Merchant Assurance Co Ltd

Otieno t/a OM Otieno & Co Advocates v African Merchant Assurance Co Ltd (Miscellaneous Application E068 of 2022) [2024] KEHC 10798 (KLR) (18 September 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 10798 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION E068 OF 2022 MS SHARIFF, J SEPTEMBER 18, 2024 BETWEEN OUMA MAURICE OTIENO T/A OM OTIENO & CO ADVOCATES ............................................................................................. APPLICANT AND AFRICAN MERCHANT ASSURANCE CO LTD ........................... RESPONDENT RULING 1. I have considered the notice of motion dated 20.3.2024, the affidavit in support thereof sworn by Ouma Maurice Otieno and the enclosures thereon and I have also considered the oral submissions of parties’ Counsels noting the concession made by the Respondent and I thus allow the same and make the following orders:1. The certificate of costs dated 13.10.2022 for the sum of Kshs.156,134 is hereby adopted as a judgment of this court. 2. The same shall attract interest at the rate of 14% from 28.2.2023 until payment in full. 3. No orders are made on costs. 4. The above ruling to apply mutatis mutandis to Kisumu Misc. App. Nos E059/2022 to E073 of 2022. 5. Orders of stay of execution are granted for a period of 30 days in all the above matters and in this matter. 6. Files marked as closed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024. M. S. SHARIFF https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/10798/eng@2024-09-18 1

page 1 of 2

JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/10798/eng@2024-09-18 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.