Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Lilian Achieng Owino & 2 others v Republic

Owino & 2 others v Republic (Criminal Revision E131 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 10622 (KLR) (10 September 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 10622 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU CRIMINAL REVISION E131 OF 2024 RE ABURILI, J SEPTEMBER 10, 2024 BETWEEN LILIAN ACHIENG OWINO ............................................................. 1ST APPLICANT LAVENDER AKOTH ADUKE ......................................................... 2ND APPLICANT MILLICENT AKINYI AWANDO .................................................... 3RD APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT (From the original conviction and sentence in Kisumu Chief Magistrate’s Court Criminal Case No. 78 of 2019) RULING 1. I have considered the sentences imposed on the three convicts Lilian Achieng Owino, Lavenda Akoth Aduke and Millicent Akinyi Awando vide Kisumu CM Criminal Case No. 78 of 2019. 2. The three convicts also filed appeals before this court, which appeals were heard and dismissed. 3. I find no reason to revisit the sentences which were upheld by this court on appeal. 4. The convicts were given options of fines. The sums of money stolen from the complainant was quite huge and there is no indication as to where they took that money which they are unwilling to refund to the complainant. 5. I decline any attempt to review the sentences imposed. 6. This file is closed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 R. E. ABURILI https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/10622/eng@2024-09-10 1

page 1 of 2

JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/10622/eng@2024-09-10 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.