Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Alfred Odhiambo Oywer

Republic v Oywer (Criminal Case E025 of 2022) [2024] KEHC 10117 (KLR) (7 August 2024) (Judgment) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 10117 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT HOMA BAY CRIMINAL CASE E025 OF 2022 KW KIARIE, J AUGUST 7, 2024 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ................................................................................................. APPLICANT AND ALFRED ODHIAMBO OYWER ........................................................ RESPONDENT JUDGMENT 1. Alfred Odhiambo Oywer is charged with an ofience of murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code. 2. The defendant is accused of unlawfully killing Consolata Otieno Ochando on July 22, 2022, at the Kobuya location in Rachuonyo North Sub County of Homa Bay County. 3. The body of the deceased was found lying in a sand mine. The body was naked. A cap was found at the scene, and some recovered clothes linked the accused to the ofience. 4. The accused pleaded an alibi and denied ownership of the cap, which was said to have been recovered at the scene. 5. The issues for determination are: 6. Whether the cap recovered at the scene where the body of the deceased belonged to the accused; 7. Whether the items recovered were in the house of the accused; 8. Whether the alibi defence of the accused was displaced or not; and 9. Whether the ofience of murder was proved against any or all the accused. 10. The cap recovered at the scene was subjected to DNA analysis. The DNA profile generated from the cap was partial and inconclusive. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/10117/eng@2024-08-07 1

page 1 of 2

11. The accused denied ownership of the cap and contended that he wears a woollen cap, commonly known as “Marvin.” 12. The prosecution did not prove that the cap belonged to the accused. 13. According to PC Robi Stella (PW9) 's evidence, they went to the homestead where the accused lived. They recovered a kitenge dress from an abandoned house and a pair of female grey plastic shoes. When they were led to the accused's house by his mother, they recovered an ashtray and some cigarette filters. The cigarette filters and the ashtray were not taken for analysis as expected, especially after two pieces of cigarettes were found at the scene where the body of the deceased was found. 14. The investigating officer did not adduce any evidence to show that the accused was in control of the abandoned house where the exhibits were allegedly recovered. Secondly, the prosecution did not bother to elicit evidence of the number of occupants of the homestead where the accused stays. 15. There was no direct evidence to link the accused to the ofience of murder. All we have is evidence of suspicion. The Court of Appeal in the case of Sawe vs Republic [2003] KLR 354 held as follows: Suspicion, however strong, cannot provide the basis for inferring guilt, which must be proved by evidence beyond reasonable doubt. 1. in his defence, the accused contended that he was at the funeral the entire night. Martin Moses Alal (PW3) testified he saw him at the previous night's vigil. So, did Alfred Odhiambo Achiando (PW2). When an accused raises an alibi defence, they do not assume any burden to prove that it is the truth. This was stated in the case of Kiarie vs Republic [1984] KLR, where the Court of Appeal held: An alibi raises a specific defence and an accused person who puts forward an alibi as an answer to a charge does not in law thereby assume any burden of proving that answer and it is sufficient if an alibi introduces into the mind of a court a doubt that is not unreasonable. 1. In the instant case, the prosecution did not displace the alibi defence of the accused. 2. I find that the prosecution has not proved the ofience of murder against the accused. I accordingly acquit him of the ofience of murder and set him at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held. DELIVERED AND SIGNED AT HOMA BAY THIS 7TH DAY OF AUGUST 2024 SIGNED BY: HON JUSTICE W. KIARIE THE JUDICIARY OF KENYA. HOMABAY HIGH COURT HIGH COURT DIV DATE: 2024-08-08 10:31:32+03 THE JUDICIARY OF KENYA https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/10117/eng@2024-08-07 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.