Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Peter Musumba Okwemba v Republic

Okwemba v Republic (Criminal Revision E111 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 10029 (KLR) (12 August 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 10029 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU CRIMINAL REVISION E111 OF 2024 RE ABURILI, J AUGUST 12, 2024 BETWEEN PETER MUSUMBA OKWEMBA ........................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT ((From the original conviction and sentence in Maseno SPM Criminal Case No. 809 of 2013)) RULING 1. The applicant is a convict on two counts of robbery with violence contrary to section 296(2) of the Penal Code and was sentenced to death on both counts. He appealed vide Kisumu HCRA No. 55, 56 and 57 of 2015 which appeal was dismissed. He now seeks sentence rehearing on account that he has reformed as per the life skills that he has acquired in prison as annexed. That he is a total orphan who lost his mother in January this year. 2. The application is for revision of sentence which the applicant alleges is mandatory and unconstitutional. 3. I have considered the application and the grounds as argued and the lengthy submissions and documents annexed. Thai court is unable to revise lawful sentence through an application. 4. The application is declined and dismissed. 5. Signal to issue. 6. This file is closed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 R.E. ABURILI https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/10029/eng@2024-08-12 1

page 1 of 2

JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/10029/eng@2024-08-12 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.