Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Joseph Gikundi Mugambi

Republic v Mugambi (Criminal Case 29 of 2015) [2024] KEHC 9881 (KLR) (8 August 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 9881 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MERU CRIMINAL CASE 29 OF 2015 EM MURIITHI, J AUGUST 8, 2024 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ........................................................................................... PROSECUTION AND JOSEPH GIKUNDI MUGAMBI .................................................................. ACCUSED RULING 1. Joseph Gikundi Mugambi is charged with the ofience of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code with particulars that he “on the 13th day of July 2013 at Shauri Estate within Mutuati Market, Kabachi location, Igembe North Sub-County within Meru County jointly with another not before the Court murdered Selesio Ntarangwi.” The accused person pleaded not guilty to the charge and the matter proceeded to trial. The prosecution called 3 witnesses. 2. Bearing the elements of the ofience of murder in mind, the Court has, as required under section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code, considered whether there is the evidence that the accused person committed the ofience, on a prima facie basis within the meaning of Ramanlal T. Bhatt v R [1957] EA 332, 335 as “one on which a reasonable tribunal properly directing its mind to the law and the evidence could convict if no explanation is ofiered by the defence.” 3. The court takes the view that a prima facie case has been established and, as held in Kibera Karimi v. R [1979] KLR 36 (Trevelyan & Todd JJ), it is not appropriate to give full reasons for that decision so as not to prejudice the fair trial of the case by giving the impression that the court has already made up its mind without hearing the defence. See also Festo Wandera Mukando v R [1976 – 80] KLR 1626 and Antony Njue Njeru v R, Nairobi C.A. Cr. Appeal No. 77 of 2006 and the Kenya Judiciary Criminal Procedure Benchbook, 2018 at 99-100. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/9881/eng@2024-08-08 1

page 1 of 2

Orders 4. Consequently, the accused shall be put on his defence in accordance with section 306 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, and his rights during the defence hearing shall be explained. Order accordingly. DATED AND DELIVERED ON THIS 8TH DAY OF AUGUST 2024. EDWARD M. MURIITHI JUDGE Appearances Mr. Masila for the DPP/Prosecutor. Mr. Ngéntu for the Accused. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/9881/eng@2024-08-08 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.