Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Mfi Doucments Solutions Ltd v County Government of Taita Taveta & 1 other

MFI Doucments Solutions Ltd v County Government of Taita Taveta & 2 others (Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E001 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 9565 (KLR) (11 July 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 9565 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT VOI JUDICIAL REVIEW MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION E001 OF 2024 GMA DULU, J JULY 11, 2024 IN THE MATTER OF: AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO INSTITUTE JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS FOR ORDERS OF MANDAMUS BY MFI DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS LIMITED -ANDIN THE MATTER OF: THE LAW REFORM ACT, SECTIONS 8 AND 9 (CAP.26) LAWS OF KENYA -ANDIN THE MATTER OF: ARTICLE 47 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA -ANDIN THE MATTER OF: THE PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT ACT, 2012 -ANDIN THE MATTER OF: SECTIONS 44 AND 45 OF THE COUNTY GOVERNMENTS ACT, 2012 -ANDIN THE MATTER OF: THE GOVERNMENT PROCEEDING ACT, CAP. 40 OF THE LAWS OF KENYA BETWEEN MFI DOUCMENTS SOLUTIONS LTD ................................................. APPLICANT AND COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF TAITA TAVETA ...................... 1ST RESPONDENT COUNTY EXECUTIVE MEMBER FOR FINANCE, COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF TAITA TAVETA ...................................................................... 2ND RESPONDENT https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/9565/eng@2024-07-11 1

page 1 of 2

COUNTY SECRETARY, COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF TAITA TAVETA .......................................................................................... 3RD RESPONDENT RULING 1. Before me is a Notice of Motion dated 14th February 2024 filed under Order 53 Rules 1(1), (2) and (3), 3 and 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Section 3 of the Law Reform Act (Cap.26), and Section 7 and 8 of the Judicature Act (Cap.8). 2. The prayers in the application are for Judicial Review orders of mandamus against the respondents to pay the decretal amount in Voi Cmcc No. E016 of 2021 MFI Document Solutions =versus= County Governmen Tof Taita Taveta. 3. This court having ordered that the said application be served, and though two afidavits of service were filed herein dated 28th May 2024 and 4th July 2024, no response to the application was filed by the respondents. The respondents also did not participate in the proceedings. 4. The application was canvassed through written submissions. In this regard, only S. A. Amadi & Company Advocates for the ex-parte applicant filed their submissions, which I have perused and considered. 5. Since this application is not opposed, and the documents filed herein disclose the decision of the court made in Voi Cmcc No. E016 of 2021 sought to be enforced through mandamus herein, I have no reason not to allow the application. 6. I thus allow the application, and order as follows:i. This court hereby issues orders of mandamus to direct and compel the respondents to pay the ex-parte applicant the decretal sum together with interest thereon of Kshs. 2,228,811.46 awarded which is due on account of judgment entered in Voi Cmcc E016 of 2021 Mfi Document Solutions =versus= County Government Of Taita Taveta against the respondents herein. ii. Judicial Review orders of mandamus are hereby issued to compel the respondents to pay the decretal sum of Kshs. 2,405,306.46 awarded in Voi Cmcc E016 of 2021 MFI Doucment Solutions =versus= County Government Of Taita Taveta as per the certificate of order against the Government issued on 8th December 2023. iii. The respondents are hereby ordered to comply by satisfying the decree, costs and interest in Voi Cmcc E016 of 2021 Mfi Document Solutions =versus= County Government Of Taita Taveta within 14 days of service of the order of mandamus. iv. The costs of the Judicial Review application herein will be borne by the respondents. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY 2024 IN OPEN COURT AT VOI VIRTUALLY. GEORGE DULU JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/9565/eng@2024-07-11 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.