Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Joram Awayo Apuoyo v Republic

Apuoyo v Republic (Criminal Revision E180 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 9443 (KLR) (23 July 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 9443 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAKURU CRIMINAL REVISION E180 OF 2024 PN GICHOHI, J JULY 23, 2024 BETWEEN JORAM AWAYO APUOYO ..................................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. This file has been brought up for Revision in order to decongest the Nakuru GK prison. 2. The Applicant (Joram Awayo Apuoyo) was charged in Molo MCCR E2180 of 2023 with the ofience of Cultivating Prohibited plants contrary to Section 6(a) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Control Act No. 4 of 1994. 3. The particulars are that on the 29th Day of September, 2023 at Mawe farm village of Visoi Location in Rongai Sub-County within Nakuru County, was found having cultivated plants of cannabis (bhang) to wit 3 plants worth 500/= in contravention of the said Act. 4. He pleaded guilty and was sentenced to pay a fine of Ksh.20,000/= in default six (6) months imprisonment. 5. The Sentence Review Report by the Probation officer has now confirmed that the Applicant has since served the sentence. 6. In the circumstances the application has been overtaken by events and file marked as closed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAKURU THIS 23TH DAY OF JULY, 2024. PATRICIA GICHOHI JUDGE In the presence of: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/9443/eng@2024-07-23 1

page 1 of 2

Mr. Kihara for Respondent Probation oficer Ruto - Court Assistant https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/9443/eng@2024-07-23 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.