Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

James Muraya Wanjiru v Republic

Wanjiru v Republic (Criminal Revision E172 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 9437 (KLR) (23 July 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 9437 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAKURU CRIMINAL REVISION E172 OF 2024 PN GICHOHI, J JULY 23, 2024 BETWEEN JAMES MURAYA WANJIRU .................................................................. APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. This file has been brought up for Revision in order to decongest the Nakuru GK prison. 2. The Applicant (James Muraya Wanjiru) was charged in Molo MCCR E113 of 2024 with the ofience of Breaking into a building with intent to commit a felony, contrary to Section 307 of the Penal Code. 3. The particulars are that on the 13th Day of January, 2024 at Cheponde village, Arimi Location in Molo Sub – County within Nakuru County, jointly with others not before court you broke a shop belonging to Francis Kimani Karauni with intent to steal from therein. 4. He pleaded guilty and was sentenced to twelve (12) months imprisonment. 5. The Sentence Review Report by the Probation officer has now confirmed that the Applicant has since served the sentence. 6. In the circumstances the application has been overtaken by events and file marked as closed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAKURU THIS 23TH DAY OF JULY, 2024. PATRICIA GICHOHI JUDGE In the presence of: Mr. Kihara for Respondent https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/9437/eng@2024-07-23 1

page 1 of 2

Probation officer Ruto - Court Assistant https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/9437/eng@2024-07-23 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.